10 thoughts on “C33 – Smith

    1. that is a great question! and to be honest we, and the TA’s, were not sure because it did not show up in the other -RT samples for the RPP0 and RAD 51 which is what would have happened if it was gDNA contamination. It was either a loading issue in the gal or some miss pipetting for that specific tube.

      Like

    1. we were assigned this gene. and yes, it was a little bit harder because of the lack of analogs and information but that was exciting in it’s own way!

      Like

  1. Two questions:
    1. What was the cause of contamination on your first two trials and how did you eliminate it?
    2. How was protein assay further this research?

    Like

    1. the first issue was caused by a miss loading of the gel we believe. the second contamination was quite confusing actually and we think it was the wrong DNA sample was loading into the tube but we are unsure to be honest.
      a protein assay would show us gene expression which can be more direct and influential then mRNA expression

      Like

    1. Good question. The contamination made the results inviable which meant we could not move forward. thanks!

      Like

    1. good question, we are definitely not sure it is involved in DNA repair. the fact that it is up regulated when damage happens is a good correlation but that is it.

      Like

Leave a Reply